Moral Considerations
Most of the moral things was basically protected, according to recommendations regarding Resolution No. of one’s Ministry away from Health. The conduct try approved by the Stability and Lookup Chamber of the new Centro de- Filosofia elizabeth Ciencias Humanas of your own Universidade Federal would Rio de- Janeiro (UFRJ) (CAAE No. 03490118.8. and you can Process Zero. step three.). Into first page of your on the internet questionnaire, there was the brand new Free and you will Advised Consent Identity (FICT), hence shown facts about the risks and advantages of reacting the new data, additionally the guarantee from detachment regarding concur, in the place of prejudice and also at any time. Only those participants which appeared the latest agree choice had the means to access the analysis posts. People who didn’t check the consent solution was in fact redirected to help you the end of the latest survey.
To analyze you’ll variations in PCM and you may NCM, depending on the sociodemographic details: sex, community, proper care of younger siblings, presence otherwise absence of a partner, and having or perhaps not which have children, evaluations between teams have been made utilising the Mann-Whitney You shot ( Table step 1).
In the 1st, the relationship ranging from PCM and NCM try analyzed and it are found that PCM (M = ; DP = ) correlates adversely to the NCM (Yards = ; DP = ); p =
Statistically significant differences with small effect sizes were found in PCM in three categories tested: occupation (U = 37; p = .035; PS est = .47), presence/absence of partner (U = 10; p = .000; PS est = .29) and presence/absence of children (U = 21; p = .002; PS est svenska killar datingsida = .44). It was observed that the participants who were unemployed (Mdn = ), who had one or more children (Mdn = ) and who were in a relationship (Mdn = ); had significantly higher levels of PCM than people who worked (Mdn = ), who had no children (Mdn = ) and who did not have a relationship (Mdn = ).
On the other hand, NCM indicated statistically significant differences with small effect sizes related to sex (U = 19; p = .000; PS est = .43) and the presence/absence of children (U = 10; p = .000; PS est = .34). It was observed that both women (Mdn = ) as for the participants who do not have children (Mdn = ) have significantly higher levels of NCM than men (Mdn = ) and participants with children (Mdn = ).
Based on the results obtained in the comparison between people who are or are not in a stable relationship, we tested the possible differences in PCM according to the type of relationship using the Kruskal Wallis test. 000). Mann-Whitney tests were used to follow up on this finding. A Bonferroni correction was applied and all effects were tested at the .02 level. PCM levels showed no differences between people who were dating and people who were married or in a stable union (U = 29; p = .039; PS est = .47). However, statistically significant differences were found in PCM levels between married and in a stable union (U = 5; p = .000; PS est = .41), of which married people (Mdn = ) had higher levels of PCM when compared to people who were in a stable union (Mdn = ).
Several Spearman correlations was indeed presented. 000; r = -.494; roentgen dos = .24. Regarding 2nd studies the brand new relationships ranging from PCM, NCM and 16 personal and you may contextual details was checked-out and certainly will rise above the crowd inside the Dining table dos. Weak connections were discover one another positive and negative anywhere between PCM or NCM and you may twelve of the details tested. Especially brand new sociodemographic parameters: “number of siblings” and you can “delivery acquisition” together with personality products: “conscientiousness” and you may “transparency to try out” shown zero significant correlations having PCM and you may NCM.
